This site uses cookies.

PIBULJ

Hope for Those in Pain? - Steven Weddle, Hardwicke

24/09/12. In the last 20 years the understanding and acceptance of pain conditions in both medical and legal contexts has advanced significantly. Advances in medicine have given doctors a better understanding of internal processes, and many causes of pain that used only to be identified after death can now be identified early with modern investigative techniques. Despite that, it can still be very hard to prove the "reality" of pain in the legal context. This is emphasised by the curious fact that...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/selimaksan

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


Loss of No Claims Bonus - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers

19/09/12. By far the most common thing that clients in road traffic accident cases say at court is “hasn’t this taken a long time”. I suspect that not much can be done to address this concern. Despite reforms intended to speed up the process especially in low value cases, litigation inevitably longer than many expect. But I wonder whether more could be done to address the second most common concern that clients raise in road traffic accident cases: “what about my no claims bonus?” Many individuals find that by the time they get to court, they have already had to pay a higher annual insurance premium as a result of the ongoing claim. This cost is often as significant to the individual as the insurance excess, but in my experience loss of no claims bonus is...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/DNY59

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


Editorial: Can Motor Insurers Improve Cooperation? - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers

19/09/12. I was recently asked to speak at the Insurance Post Claims Club about the High Court decision in Coles v Hetherton on the Royal and Sun Alliance repairs charges cases. It was a daunting brief, not least because representatives of both parties formed part of the audience. I hope that I navigated the issues without causing too much offence.

One of the most interesting aspects of the discussion that day related to the issue of cooperation between Insurers. The suggestion is that...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/BrianAJackson

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


Subscribe to PIBULJ.COM

Join PIBULJ.COM, the UK's leading online personal injury journal for the very latest opinions and case law from the country's leading practitioners. Over 1000 articles written by our team of more than 100 specialist PI barristers and other legal experts. Subscribers receive:

• Up-to-the minute comment and analysis from leading PI barristers and other experts. 
• Around 25 new articles each month.
• An archive of over 1000 personal injury articles.
• Reading PIBULJ articles can contribute to CPD requirements for solicitors, barristers and legal executives.

Solicitors
Just £299 per year for your whole office. Special rates for multiple offices.
Barristers & Experts
Just £149 per year for barristers (in independent practise), single user experts, academics etc.
Pupils etc
Contact us for a reduced rate if you are a pupil or on garden leave, etc.

NOTE: From 1st May 2020 online journals are now zero VAT rated.

No card required. It takes just a minute to fill in our sign-up form below, and you can pay by card, Paypal, BACS, or cheque. Either way we'll aim to get you activated within one working day, subject to our approval and validation of your contact details and occupation.

Questions? If you have any questions at all about subscribing or anything else, please call us on 08445 873283 or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Still Not Sure? Click here for a one month trial for just £1!




Symptom Validity (Effort) Testing in Clinical Neuropsychology - Dr Tracey Ryan-Morgan, Talis Consulting Limited

18/09/12. Effort testing became central to neuropsychological assessments due to the proven inability of the experienced clinician to detect individuals exerting sub-optimal effort (McCarter, Walton, Brooks & Powell, 2009). A range of taxonomies have developed over time in relation to the concept of “effort”. Bush, Ruff, Troster, Barth, Koffler, Pliskin, Reynolds & Silver (2005, in their National Academy of Neuropsychology Position Paper) refer to the following definitions, which are adopted for the purposes of this paper:

    • symptom validity: the accuracy or truthfulness of the examinee's behavioural presentation (signs) self-reported symptoms (including their cause and course) or performance on neuropsychological measures.

    • response bias: an attempt to mislead the assessor through inaccurate or incomplete responses or effort...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/ericsphotography

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.