Three strikes, you’re still in? What Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers [2012] UKSC 26 tells us about fraud - David Sawtell, 4 King's Bench Walk
18/09/12. The significance of Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers [2012] UKSC 26 lies not in the decision that the Supreme Court reached but in the approach to abuse of process that it approved. At the end of a trial, where it is possible to make a fair award of damages in favour of a claimant, it is deeply unlikely that the court will strike out the entire claim as an abuse of process. Viewed on its own facts, then, the progress from Ul Haq v Shah [2009] EWCA Civ 542, where it was said that it was not possible to strike out a claim in this way, is glacial. Instead, it is the encouragement that the Supreme Court gave to litigants faced with other scenarios that will affect personal injury practice.
Image cc flickr.com/photos/gareth1953/6316198474/
Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...







