This site uses cookies.

PIBULJ

Priming the Pump: Solicitors and Non Party Costs Orders - David Sawtell, 4 King's Bench Walk

18/04/13. The litigation in Germany v Flatman; Barchester Healthcare Ltd v Weddall [2013] EWCA Civ 278 posed a very important question for personal injury litigators: in what circumstances do solicitors acting for claimants make themselves vulnerable to an application for non party costs? Under a conditional fee agreement, a lay client typically does not have to pay for his solicitor’s costs if his claim is unsuccessful. Almost all claims, however, require...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/DNY59

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

Jason Sharp v Top Flight Scaffolding Ltd - Nicholas Baldock, 6 Pump Court

17/04/13. The case of Jason Sharp has raised some interest in Personal Injury circles given the high level of contributory negligence (60%) ascribed to the Claimant. A number of authorities were cited and reviewed at the hearing although only Sherlock -v- Chester City Council [2004] EWCA Civ 201 was specifically cited in the judgment. Claimants can and do assert that statutory duties are designed to secure health and safety and should not be emasculated by high levels of contributory negligence. Courts therefore...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/BartCo

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

The Future Lost Earnings of Catastrophically Injured Children - Chris Gutteridge, Exchange Chambers

16/04/13. How is a judge supposed to make any estimation of what a young child would have earned in his or her adult life in the absence of a catastrophic injury? It is an unquestionably difficult task. That task falls on the claimant’s representatives. The court must be provided with sufficient evidence to come to a (favourable) conclusion on the claimant’s likely uninjured career path. Guidance as to what that evidence should address and, perhaps, how it should be presented...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/pagadesign

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

PI Practitioner, April 2013

16/04/13. Each issue a particular topic is highlighted, citing some of the useful cases and other materials in that area. You can also receive these for free by registering for our PI Brief Update newsletter. Simply fill in your email address at the top right of this website. This month: Relief from sanctions - the new CPR 3.9.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/EmiliaU

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


Skidding on Black Ice: is the Driver at Fault? (Smith v Fordyce [2013] EWCA Civ 320) - Tom Gibson, Outer Temple Chambers

15/04/13. Do you ever advise on road traffic accidents where the defendant’s case is that no-one was at fault because the accident happened despite reasonable care being taken? If so then you may be interested in the recent Court of Appeal case of Smith v (1) Fordyce (2) Quinn Insurance Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 320. Smith v Fordyce does not extend the law. However it is an interesting reminder of...

Image cc flickr.com/photos/m-wolstenholme/

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.