‘Knowledge’ for Limitation Purposes: Is It Sufficient for a Claimant to Believe the Surgeons Had Resected Too Much Acromion When in Fact They Had Completely Detached the Deltoid Muscle? - Simon Wheatley, 7 Bedford Row
04/05/13. The definition of knowledge for the purposes of sections 11 and 14 of the Limitation Act 1980 is a subject which has generated a generous amount of legal scholarship. One only has to think of Nash v Eli Lilly [1993] 4 All ER 383, Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority [1996] 4 All ER 881 and Spargo v North Essex District Health Authority (1997) PIQR 235 to realise how many times the central issue of what knowledge is required and when it is triggered has been analysed and considered. And behind that triumvirate there lies a depth of further cases, all contributing to the subject. So you might think that there would be no requirement for...
Image: public domain via wikipedia







