This site uses cookies.

Part 36 Does What It Says (Again): A Commentary on Jolly v. Harsco Infrastructure Services Limited - Philip Turton, Ropewalk Chambers

16/01/13. Since the last change made to Part 36 by the Rules Committee on 6th April 2007, that section of the Civil Procedure Rules has probably occupied the Courts more than any other. Practitioners who may not have immediately appreciated the consequence of the changes then made have, in due course, been replaced by practitioners seeking every more inventive ways to obtain advantage for their clients. There can be no doubt that Part 36 has attracted applications both ingenious and convoluted in their attempt to either invoke or avoid what would otherwise be its consequences.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/BrianAJackson

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.