How to Assess Credibility in the Courtroom? - Dr Ben Goodall, Dr Hugh Koch & Poppy Gould
30/11/12. Review of publication by Porter S & Brinke L.T (2009). Dangerous Decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. The civil and criminal legal system relies on making fair and accurate decision concerning reliability, truthfulness, guilt and lying (Koch and Kevan (2005)). It is not possible to empirically evaluate the accuracy of outcomes in court. Whereas with psychological science and experiments which relies on an acceptable error rate of 5%, court decisions typically use ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ or ‘on the balance of probability’ as their criteria. We know that...
Image ©iStockphoto.com/VisualField
Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...







