This site uses cookies.

How to Litigate and Win an RTA Case with an Allegation of Fraud - Andrew Mckie, Clerksroom

10/08/12. Insurance fraud is on the increase. Undetected general insurance claims fraud total £2.1billion a year adding on average £50 to the annual costs individual policyholder’s policy, on average, each year (Source: Insurance Fraud Bureau).

This is a problem not only for insurance companies but for the Claimant Solicitors who represent Claimants, involved in these type of collisions, where a case has to be dropped due to an allegation of fraud or in the rare instance that a finding of fraud is made at Trial. This results in wasted costs for the Claimant’s Solicitor who has sometimes expedited considerable expense to progress the matter to Trial in both the fee earner’s time and disbursements that are unlikely to be recovered from the Claimant’s ATE insurer or the Claimant himself.

In my experience, it is not unusual to see a Claimant’s base profit costs for an RTA case to Trial with an allegation of fraud to exceed £15,000. The question therefore is, how does one ensure that an RTA case, with an allegation of fraud, can be given the best possible opportunity to succeed at Trial?

This article will look at both investigations that can be undertaken where an allegation of fraud has been made, as well as tactical and procedural considerations for RTA claims where an allegation of fraud has been made or intimated by the Defendant.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/bagi1998

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.