Striking Out Fraudulent Claims at the End of a Trial: The Supreme Court decision in Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers - Aidan Ellis, Temple Garden Chambers
02/07/12. The increase in the number of fraudulent or dishonestly exaggerated claims has prompted calls from Defendants for the Court to strike out such claims after the end of a trial, including in situations where only part of the claim is dishonest.
The issue came before the Supreme Court in Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers (2012) UKSC 26. The facts as found at first instance are typical of the issues which arise in these cases. The Claimant was injured in an accident at work in 2003. He served a Schedule of Loss claiming more than £800,000, including a claim for ongoing loss of earnings and continuing symptoms. The Court found, on the basis of surveillance evidence, that in fact he had been able to go back to work from June 2007, and that even prior to that date he was not as housebound as he had suggested. The Judge found explicitly that “the evidence before me...
Image ©iStockphoto.com/bedo
Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...







