This site uses cookies.

An update on the DSM-5 - Katie Newns & Hugh Koch

02/04/12. Since our article in May 2010 (Newns, Thorne & Koch, 2010) there has been some fierce debate around the proposed DSM-5. The British Psychological Society (BPS) have submitted a concerned response, and the American Psychological Association (APA), the American Counselling Association, and a group of professionals from Barcelona have all drawn up petitions to encourage the APS to rethink the new DSM.

There are some generally welcome changes in the DSM-5, including a formal process to assess the risk of suicide, the inclusion of self-injury, a checklist to assess panic attacks, and the inclusion of a diagnosis for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in pre-school children. There has also been a lot of work put into clarifying some of the current categories – within Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, for example, it is made clear that “flashbacks” are...

Image ©iStockphoto.com/ericsphotography

Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...


All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.