This site uses cookies.

Road Traffic Accident Diagrams: the Court of Appeal says “Use Google Maps” - Tom Gibson, Pupil Barrister, Outer Temple Chambers

20/01/12. Are you still using diagrams coupled with lots of photos from different angles to describe the location of road traffic accidents?  

If you are then you should be using aerial photos from Google Maps (or other online resources), said the Court of Appeal in Ievers v Prebble [2010] EWCA Civ 1615.

Ievers v Prebble involved a road traffic accident on a four lane, five road roundabout near Leicester City Centre.  After allowing the appeal (and reducing the defendant’s share of liability from 30% to zero), Sedley LJ had this to say about road traffic accident diagrams: 

“Our papers, like the judge's, included a sketch plan of the roundabout, showing in places directional arrows which were plainly incorrect and photographs which, as always in road traffic cases, distort perspective sufficiently to render them at least useless and at most dangerous. It is therefore a piece of good fortune that the judge happened to be familiar with this roundabout. One prefers not to visualise what would have happened if she had had to take to a view in comparably heavy traffic. But what neither the judge nor the parties had was the aerial photograph which Moses LJ, or perhaps more accurately his clerk, was able without undue difficulty to download from the internet over the short adjournment. I would respectfully commend this resource to solicitors, counsel and courts which need a serviceable view in plan of a location in the United Kingdom.” (para 26, emphasis added).

So there you have it.  Next time you need to describe or to understand an accident, reach for the aerial photos on Google Maps before trying to rely on sketch plans and photos.

 

Tom Gibson
Pupil Barrister, Outer Temple Chambers

All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain. 

The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand. 

Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.

Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.