30/09/11. There has been increasing concern about fraud in personal injury claims. Nield v Loveday [2011] EWHC 2324 Admin is the most recent case showing how severe the consequences to a claimant and his witnesses can be if they are shown to have lied about the extent of their injuries, not in court, but in documents verified by a statement of truth prior to any hearing.
Read more (PIBULJ subscribers only)...
All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain.
The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand.
Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.
Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.
The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand.
|
|
NOTE: From 1st May 2020 online
journals are now zero VAT rated.
Write for PIBULJ.COM
Get your name seen by around 12,000 readers of our website and newsletters. Click here for more information on writing for us.
Advertise on PIBULJ.COM
Get your message seen by PI practitioners across the UK with a text ad, banner ad, or sponsored post on this website, or a banner ad in our newsletters. Click here for more information.
PI Industry News
Advertising watchdog targets motor CMCs in latest crackdown...
Government hints at more controls on RTA damages and costs...
Six-figure sum agreed after baby's choking death...
Government seeks evidence for whiplash review...
Public spending watchdog calls for clin neg costs curbs...
Surveillance company slated for ‘extremely poor’ behaviour in PI case...
Law firm acting for 18 insurers defeats data breach claim in PI battle...
Defendant law firms 'protecting litigation work' with credit hire row...
Solicitor who ran mesh claims facing multiple charges...
Judge awards just £1,200 after credit hire firm claimed £50k...
Credit Hire Articles
We have now published more than 50 specialist credit hire articles. A selection are shown below, or see the complete list here. Subscribers can also access, for free, the latest edition of Kevan & Ellis on Credit Hire.
28/09/23. Mr Justice Martin Spencer gave judgment in an appeal by the Claimant against the dismissal of the claim for credit hire charges on the basis that a lack of an MOT certi...
![Appeal judge rules that credit hire company has no costs liability following a finding of fundamental dishonesty in personal injury case: RSA v. Fastrack Solutions Limited [2023] 4 WLUK 92 - David Bowden, Erimus Chambers](/content/images/resized/images/stories/carkeys_72_72.jpg)
29/05/23. Mr Shazad staged a car accident on 25th November 2015. The other driver said at the beginning ‘ I thought the accident was suspicious straight away’ . A court claim ...
30/11/18. As long ago as 2004, in the course of carving out the impecuniosity exception in Lagden v O’Connor, Lord Nicholls expressed the hope that the parties “should be able t...
30/07/18. In Credit hire arguments go in circles, at least that is the experience of the writer (who has now been engaged in conducting credit hire claims for nearly 15 years), w...
11/09/14. In Dimond v Lovell the House of Lords made it all seem so simple. In a case where the claimant sought hire charges in the princely sum of £346.63, it was held that ...
10/04/14. Disputes relating to disclosure remain an enduring feature of credit hire litigation and, largely to the understandable annoyance of the judiciary, are the source of mu...
Privacy Policy Legal Resources
© Copyright Law Brief Publishing Ltd, all rights reserved.
Published by Law Brief Publishing Ltd, company number 05966609, registered in the UK. Registered office address: 30 The Parks, Minehead, Somerset, TA24 8BT.
All information on this site was believed to be correct by the relevant authors at the time of writing. All content is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. No liability is accepted by either the publisher or the author(s) for any errors or omissions (whether negligent or not) that it may contain.
The opinions expressed in the articles are the authors' own, not those of Law Brief Publishing Ltd, and are not necessarily commensurate with general legal or medico-legal expert consensus of opinion and/or literature. Any medical content is not exhaustive but at a level for the non-medical reader to understand.
Professional advice should always be obtained before applying any information to particular circumstances.
Excerpts from judgments and statutes are Crown copyright. Any Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland under the Open Government Licence.
